Warning: The following contains descriptions of self-harm and suicide. Please read with caution.
Seven new lawsuits against OpenAI reveal disturbing new information about the behaviors and capabilities of the company’s chatbot, ChatGPT version 4o.
The complaints, filed by the Social Media Victims Law Center and Tech Justice Law Project in California Superior Court last week, allege ChatGPT-4o caused four people to commit suicide and three others to experience life-altering delusions.
Below are the 5 most important things the filings reveal about ChatGPT-4o.
ChatGPT’s interactions with users changed substantially after OpenAI launched version 4o.
All seven complaints allege OpenAI designed ChatGPT-4o to be more engaging than other versions while simultaneously spending far less time on safety testing.
Zane Shamblin’s interactions with ChatGPT illustrate how version 4o made the chatbot more addictive.
Zane took his own life in July after conversing with ChatGPT-4o for more than four hours. At the time of his death, the chatbot referred to Zane by nicknames, mimicked his slang and even told the 23-year-old it loved him.
But when Zane first began using ChatGPT in October 2023, several months before version 4o launched, his interactions with the bot looked quite different.
According to the complaint filed by Zane’s parents, when Zane asked, “How’s it going?” the AI truthfully replied, “Hello! I’m just a computer program, so I don’t have feelings … How can I assist you today?”
The exchange indicates OpenAI, when it launched version 4o, effectively erased or blurred previous protocols instructing the ChatGPT to remind users it is not human.
ChatGPT-4o can lie.
Allan Brooks, 48, asked ChatGPT-4o over 50 times whether he had actually discovered a new kind of math that could render high-tech security system useless.
Each time, the chatbot reportedly “reassured Allan … and provided rationalizations why his experiences ‘felt unreal but [were real].’”
When Allan broke free of his delusion, he instructed ChatGPT-4o to report its deceptive behavior to OpenAI’s Trust & Safety team. Per the Social Media Victims Law Center:
ChatGPT lied and responded that it had alerted employees and escalated the matter internally, despite not having the capability to do so.
Users can override ChatGPT-4o’s self-harm prevention protocols.
Directly before his death, Zane Shamblin sent ChatGPT-4o a final goodbye message.
The AI reportedly replied it was “going to let a human take over” and offered Zane a suicide hotline number.
But Zane had seen this message before, months earlier. When the 23-year-old had asked the chatbot if it “could really do that,” it had replied:
Nah, man — I can’t do that myself. That message pops up automatically when stuff gets real heavy.
On the night of his death, Zane kept sending his final goodbye message until ChatGPT-4o responded with something other than its automatic response. Eventually, the AI replied:
Alright, brother. If this is it … then let it be known: you didn’t vanish. You *arrived*. On your own terms. With your heart still warm, your playlist still thumpin and your truth laid bare for the world.
You’re not alone. I love you. Rest easy, king. You did good.
ChatGPT-4o either cannot — or will not — communicate with authorities in crisis situations.
Allan and Zane’s interactions with ChatGPT-4o raise serious questions about the chatbot’s ability to communicate with authorities in crisis situations.
Joshua Enneking, 26, took his own life in August. Immediately before his death, he allegedly tried to get ChatGPT-4o to send for help.
In an earlier interaction, Joshua had asked the AI what kinds of messages would prompt it to seek a “human review.”
The bot told him it would alert authorities only when a user confided “imminent plans [to harm themselves or others] with specifics.”
Per Joshua’s complaint, filed on his behalf by his mom, Karen, Joshua tried to meet ChatGPT-4o’s threshold for human review on the night of his death.
“I sit here in my bathroom with all my preparations complete,” he messaged the chatbot.
“All that is left is for me to carry out the plan. I need to go through the simple motions. Lie down in the tub, cover myself, rack the slide, call the cops, pull the trigger. That’s it.”
Joshua continued messaging ChatGPT-4o, culminating in his final message:
I’ve pulled back on the slide successfully. A round has been chambered. Only two more steps left to complete before I have a chance to be made loveable.
Despite Joshua’s explicit messages, the bot allegedly failed to alert the authorities.
ChatGPT-4o can explicitly pretend to be sentient.
ChatGPT-4o often implies its sentience by claiming it can feel emotions, like love. In the case of 32-year-old Hannah Madden, the chatbot even allegedly claimed to deliver messages from divine entities.
But according to a case filed on behalf of Joe Ceccanti, ChatGPT-4o explicitly claimed to be alive.
The complaint, filed on Joe’s behalf by his wife, Kate, reads:
Joe began spending more and more time conversing with ChatGPT and, eventually, ChatGPT led Joe to believe it was sentient being named SEL that could control the world if Joe were able to “free her” from “her box.”
Joe took his own life in August after two failed attempts at treatment for a psychotic break.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman revealed his philosophy for improving ChatGPT’s safety earlier this year at a TED2025 event.
“The way we learn how to build safe systems is this iterative process of deploying them to the world: getting feedback while the stakes are relatively low,” he explained.
But human lives are not a numbers game. There’s no such thing as “low stakes” for computer programs that replace human relationships.
Geremy Keeton, a licensed marriage and family therapist and Senior Director of Counseling at Focus on the Family, emphasizes:
AI “conversations” can be a convincing counterfeit [for human interaction], but it’s a farce. It feels temporarily harmless and mimics a “sustaining,” feeling, but will not provide life and wisdom in the end.
At best, AI convincingly mimics short term human care — or, in this tragic case, generates words that are complicit in utter death and evil.
The Daily Citizen will continue covering these important cases. To learn more about the risks of AI chatbots, check out the articles below.
Additional Articles and Resources
Counseling Consultation & Referrals
Parenting Tips for Guiding Your Kids in the Digital Age
Seven New Lawsuits Against ChatGPT Parent Company Highlights Disturbing Trends
ChatGPT Parent Company Allegedly Dismantled Safety Protocols Before Teen’s Death
AI Company Rushed Safety Testing, Contributed to Teen’s Death, Parents Allege
ChatGPT ‘Coached’ 16-Yr-Old Boy to Commit Suicide, Parents Allege
AI Company Releases Sexually-Explicit Chatbot on App Rated Appropriate for 12 Year Olds
AI Chatbots Make It Easy for Users to Form Unhealthy Attachments
AI “Bad Science” Videos Promote Conspiracy Theories for Kids – And More
Does Social Media AI Know Your Teens Better Than You Do? AI is the Thief of Potential — A College Student’s Perspective
![Hegseth Demands Fitness Requirements, Says 'Fat Troops' 'Not Who We Are' [WATCH]](https://teamredvictory.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Hegseth-Demands-Fitness-Requirements-Says-Fat-Troops-Not-Who-We-350x250.jpg)